Mandatory Vaccination Opponents Charge Hawaii Senator Roz Baker and Capitol Consultants Lobbyists with Bribery and Campaign Financing Fraud


Sherri Kane, Leonard G. Horowitz, and Anonymous Attorneys

Source: Hawaii Senator Roz Baker Caught in Bribery Scandal with Pfizer/Monsanto Lobbyists – Judicial Corruption

HONOLULU, HI—Political activists opposed to forced vaccinations for children and healthcare workers have unearthed evidence indicting State Senator Rosalyn Baker and Capitol Consultants lobbyists for multiple counts of campaign financing fraud and bribery, according to the group’s spokesperson Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, a Big Island resident, consumer protection advocate, and public health expert.

The ad hoc group’s investigation into Senator Baker’s campaign financing records revealed that the Chairwoman of the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee sponsored a series of mandatory vaccination bills after concealing three investments in Blackrock Inc.—a company heavily invested in Pfizer/Monsanto that produces genetically-engineered vaccines. The conflicting stocks, valued at more than a quarter million dollars, compound large campaign contributions exceeding the senator’s “aggregate contributions” limit.

The State financial records linked below evidence Sen. Baker misrepresented her valuable “iShares” of stock, concealing Blackrock, Inc, whose name she was to have disclosed on her campaign financing forms.

Investigators learned by examining State records that during Sen. Baker’s last election cycle, 2012-2014, more than $6,000 was given to her by the Capitol Consultants “aggregate.” That is at least $2,000 beyond the senator’s legal limit.

Even if a $1750 Pfizer donation was eliminated, the senator still exceeded the limit by at least $500.

“That may not seem like much,” explained investigative journalist Sherri Kane, “but if you speed only 6 miles beyond the limit and get caught, you still get a ticket and have to pay the penalty. Then, if you tell the officer a bunch of lies, while hiding drugs in your trunk, you may have to go to jail.”

Sen. Baker’s troubles are metaphorically similar. Her leading campaign donors are linked to three lies–misrepresentations on her financing statements submitted to the political oversight committee. These three misdemeanors conceal Blackrock, Inc., heavily invested in Big Pharma and Big Biotech that is trafficking “genetopharmaceuticals”–genetically-modified microbes, vaccines, and even mutant mosquitoes to fight dengue.

Blackrock–the world’s largest money management group holds major interests in Pfizer drug company, the parent of Monsanto, that, through Capitol Consultants (i.e., Honolulu lobbyists George A. Morris and John H Radcliffe) the vaccine industrialists influence elections and push new legislation.  Unfortunately for Senator Baker, these money-managers purposely concealed their association, and the “drugs” in Baker’s “trunk,” in violation of several rules and laws.


Lobbyists, Political Payoffs and Bribes

roz_baker_stillThe political payoff scheme shows Senator Baker withholding the name of Blackrock, Inc. to conceal her knowledge that her more than a quarter million dollars in “iShares”—Blackrock securities–conflicted with her duty to protect consumers from drug industry special interests and Morris/Radcliffe’s powerful political influence. Under their scheme, bribery moved Baker to sponsor laws requiring mandatory vaccinations.

Morris and Radcliffe are Hawaii’s leading lobbyists. They work as principals in two presumably separate companies using the same phone, same fax number, and same office address at 222 South Vineyard Street, Suite 401, Honolulu, HI 96813-2453, according to campaign financing records unearthed by the investigators.

Radcliffe, who pushed for gambling casinos in Honolulu, works for three closely connected lobbying firms: Radcliffe and Associates — “specializing in legislative and executive branch advocacy at all levels of government;” Capitol Consultants of Hawaii; and G.A. Morris, the latter run by Radcliffe’s partner, George “Red” Morris.

The revealing documents evidencing Senator Baker’s misrepresentations and the Radcliffe/Morris bribes are downloadable below (online at

According to Hawaii Revised Statutes §11-412(b) any scheme to conceal such information in efforts to secret excessive aggregate campaign contributions for any election cycle would be a Class C felony.[1] That’s far worse than a traffic ticket.

Per Hawaii Advisory Opinion 05-01, State Election Officials must consider Federal Election Commission Rules (CFR 110.3) for adjudicating conflicts of interest; in this case, as to whether Morris’s and Radcliffe’s contributions were financed, maintained or controlled by the same entity–Capitol Consultants–on behalf of Blackrock/Pfizer/Monsanto.

The records show that the set of specious contributions were issued for the same amount, on the same day, by the two men, Morris and Radcliffe, concealing their complicity in the crime. This is key evidence to prove a campaign finance fraud conspiracy requiring FEC investigators to consider bribery.

Screen Shot 2016-03-07 at 5.28.51 AM According to the investigators’ lead counsel, who asked to remain anonymous after discussing these matters with other lawyers and officials at the State of Hawaii Ethics Commission and Campaign Spending Commission, Sen. Baker’s incomplete, inaccurate, and potentially misleading filings should, by law, compel the Campaign Spending Commission to investigate the Senator for violations of Hawaii Revised Statute § 11-204 (f)[2]. This law covers Campaign Contribution Limits, with section 11-361 restricting aggregate contributions to no more than $4,000.

It would appear that Senator Baker’s campaign filings also violated HRS § 11-333 (2). At minimum, the lawmaker failed to exercise due diligence in ensuring contribution amounts were added correctly and source disclosures were not missing or, like Morris and Radcliffe, not compliant.[3]

The purpose in these important laws is to stop lawmakers from concealing their aggregate contributions, expenditures, and financiers with common interests that might sway elections, statutes, and the administration of government. Otherwise, voters could easily be duped, and citizens’ groups prejudiced by their inability to compete financially with lobbyists to gain political influence.


Fraud and Crime Headed for the Governor’s Signature

Senator Baker defrauded Hawaii voters and fellow legislators into believing that she served consumers’ best interests; when, in fact, the pending new laws restrict parents and health care workers from making decisions about vaccinations. As many as seven new vaccination laws have advanced during the past several months to prevent religious people and philosophical objectors from opting out of vaccination programs targeting children and hospital workers. These actions sharply conflict with civil rights and Constitutional doctrines first raised in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which Dr. Horowitz insists must now be revisited in lieu of this emerging evidence of political corruption, consumer fraud, and “regulatory capture” at the CDC undermining vaccine safety and efficacy and the rationale behind “herd immunity.”

The pending legislation contractually compels vaccinations, but it is now void due to fraud, since fraud voids all contracts.

Many California voters are similarly calling for recission of SB 277 that Governor Brown signed before considering matters of consumer fraud by officials, such as Dr. Paul Offit, whose conflicting interests appear to influence the American Academy of Pediatrics that sets the childhood vaccination schedule. The increasing number of shots being increasingly opposed by doctors and educators have become a presidential election issue after Donald Trump objected to the now 49 injections of 14 vaccines recommended by age 6; 69 by age 18.

Governor Ige will be ethically-challenged to sign the bills sponsored in “bad faith” and passed largely through Senator Baker’s fraud and crime. Under the circumstances, the Governor’s duty is to block the legislation, or otherwise be complicit in the crime.

The governor must now lawfully direct Attorney General Douglas Chin to investigate and prosecute the violators on behalf of the State of Hawaii Office of Elections and Campaign Spending Commission, based on the clear and convincing evidence of fraud and crime confirmed by officials who conferred with investigators after examining the State’s records reprinted herein.

Screen Shot 2016-03-07 at 5.35.58 AM

“Health scientists are required to openly divulge their conflicting interests,” Dr. Horowitz commented. “Fair play requires lawmakers to do the same. Citizens should not have to search through stacks of records and hire lawyers to discern conflicting interests and campaign financing violations. Legislators’ conflicts of interest should be made known, right up-front, especially concerning bills impacting public health and safety.”

The series of pro vaccination bills spurred by Sen. Baker’s financiers include SB 2316 and SB 2394, paired with House Bills 1722, 1910, 1945 and 1946. These were pushed by the Maui senator along with others who received Pfizer/Monsanto “graft” including: Josh Green, Michelle Kadani, Sylvia Luke, Suzanne Chun Oakland, Matthew Lopresti, Gil Keith-Agaran, Della Au Belatti and John Mizuno. Baker and Green received the lion’s share.

Nearly everyone expected the bills to pass both branches of government, and then gain Gov. Ige’s signature to become law. Now the legislation, by law, must be delayed by litigation(s) and criminal investigation(s).

Bribery is a Class B felony under Hawaii Revised Statute § 710-1040 (2011) [4] This means that lobbyists Morris and Radcliffe, Senator Baker, and possibly others, may go to jail for the damage they have done to good government and the public’s trust.




Editor’s Note: This matter of Blackrock, Inc.’s involvement raises related concerns unfolding on the Big Island of Hawaii where the release of genetically-modified mosquitoes is being considered in the wake of the dengue fever outbreak. See footnote [5].

CLICK Roz Baker’s Donors to view the senator’s campaign financing records showing excessive Pfizer/Monsanto contributions for 2012 to 2014 (i.e., the current financing cycle). Additional proof of the facts presented herein are provided in the final footnote, including links to related records and articles on Senator Baker.

Sen Baker’s Financial Report 8863-1 shows her misrepresentations of “iShares” as the company name instead of the required correct name of Blackrock, Inc.–the world’s largest money management group heavily investing in GM vaccines and GM mosquitoes produced by Intrexon Corporation’s Oxitec group.

CLICK: Official Complaint to the Campaign Spending Commission, Filed 3-10-16 to download Dr. Horowitz’s official Complaint to the Commission, whose duty it is to refer this matter to the State’s AG’s office.




[1] Report On: 2012-2014 1st Preliminary Primary January 1 – June 30, 2014.

[2] HRS § 11-204(f) states: “All payments made by a person or political party whose contributions or expenditure activity is financed, maintained, or controlled by any corporation, labor organization, association, political party, or any other person or committee, including any parent, subsidiary, branch, division, department, or local unit of the corporation, labor organization, association, political party, political committees established and maintained by a national political party, or any other person, or by any group of those persons shall be considered to be made by a single person or political party.”

[3] Senator Baker failed to properly report, “[t]he cash on hand at the beginning of the reporting period and election period,” as required by law.

[4] Hawaii statute 710-1040 reads in relevant part: “(1)  A person commits the offense of bribery if: (a)  The person confers, or offers or agrees to confer, directly or indirectly, any pecuniary benefit upon a public servant with the intent to influence the public servant’s vote, opinion, judgment, exercise of discretion, or other action in the public servant’s official capacity; or (b)  While a public servant, the person solicits, accepts, or agrees to accept, directly or indirectly, any pecuniary benefit with the intent that the person’s vote, opinion, judgment, exercise of discretion, or other action as a public servant will thereby be influenced.”

[5] Besides testifying before Sen. Baker’s committee in opposition to the vaccination mandates, Dr. Horowitz testified before the Hawaii County Council on the matter of dengue fever and Zika emergencies. The hearing featured Civil Defense Director Darryl Oliveira’s testimony. Horowitz and Oliveira expressed mutual admiration for promoting alternatives to risky products used to stop the threatening outbreaks. Dr. Horowitz praised Oliveira and his team for expressing parallel reservations about releasing genetically-modified (GM) mosquitoes in Hawaii.

“What is most shocking to me is that Sen. Baker’s financiers at Blackrock, Inc.,” Horowitz said, “are partnered with top officials in the companies producing these poorly tested and very risky mosquitoes. The same corporate interests complicit in bribery in Hawaii financed the GM mosquitoes through the Oxitec company, initially to administer GM vaccines through mosquito bites. The enterprise’s genetically-engineered vaccine for dengue fever is now being tested, probably in mosquitoes as well as by using syringes. Their GM mosquitoes are already being promoted using graft recipients, including Hawaii Senate candidate Greggor Ilagan from my district,” Dr. Horowitz complained. “Ilagan (pronounced “ill again), along with Dr. Sarah Park of the State health department, are promoting the release of these risky man-made mutant insects.”

Peer reviewed science advanced a high probability that the release of GM mosquitoes in Brazil created the mutated Zika virus now threatening people worldwide.

“That’s why I was very thankful, and impressed with, Director Oliveira’s colleagues who voiced their concerns to Councilman Ilagan. I had already informed Ilagan that Blackrock-affiliated GM mosquitoes produced by Oxitec produce unreliable and risky results that legislators, and even public health officials, have insufficient knowledge with which to govern or reliably consider. Moreover, regulatory capture at the CDC makes these decisions even harder. Couple difficult and conflicting science, and unreliable leadership at the CDC, compounded by this matter of bribery, and citizens are being assaulted by ignorance and political payoffs,” Horowitz explained.

Dr. Park, the State’s chief epidemiologist, who debated Horowitz by invitation of PBS television last year, has championed mandatory vaccinations along with Senator Josh Green and Sen. Baker’s committee. Park promoted the release of the Oxitec/Intrexon/Blackrock’s GM mosquitoes.

“Fraud and crime voids contracts,” Dr. Horowitz repeated. “Legislators and health officials with conflicting interests in Big Pharma and Big Biotec can’t be trusted since, as you see from Senator Baker’s example, the corporations are obviously breaking laws, deceiving voters, and risking everyone’s health and safety.”


To watch Senator Baker lying at the Kihei Community Association meeting June 17, 2014, telling voters she has “not taken money from Monsanto in a number of years.” After the meeting, a Kihei resident, holding her baby, reminded the senator of the $500 a person fundraiser thrown for her by (then) Monsanto lobbyist Alicia Maluafiti, CLICK:

To view Babes Against Biotech’s investigation report on Senator Baker, CLICK:!rosalyn-baker/c1qwz

Senator Baker falsely filed the following shares of Blackrock stock in the fields in which she was to have named the company issuing the stock, not the stock itself. concealing her conflicting interests in large amount of assets:

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF,
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF &
iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF
All the above are owned by Blackrock, Inc. See more evidence of this at:

Regarding the Senator’s “Ownership or Beneficial Interests in Businesses,” she was to have reported “the amount and identity of every ownership or beneficial interest held during the disclosure period by you, your spouse, or any dependent children in any business in or outside of the State where that interest has a value of $5,000 or more or is equal to 10% or more of the ownership of the business, including, but not limited to, stock. Report the complete name (not acronyms) of the business, the kind of activity the business is engaged in, and the nature of your, your spouse’s, or any dependent children’s interest in the business. If you, your spouse, or any of your dependent children is a shareholder of stock or mutual fund(s), you must report the number of shares owned or the approximate value of the stock or mutual fund(s). {Bold emphasis added.)

HAWAII STATE ETHICS COMMISSION Instructions for Disclosure of Financial Interests: Long Form (Form D-201) are downloadable from:

As shown in the downloadable Financial Report that Senator Baker submitted in 2016, she misrepresented the “Legal name of the business” (i.e., Blackrock, Inc.) as “iShares …” to conceal her conflicting interests in the pro-vaccination legislation. Copied from that record, here is what she filed: “Ownership or Beneficial Interests in Businesses Yes, I have items START Item #1 Who holds interest? Filer Item #1 Legal name of business IShares Cohen & Steers Item #1 Nature of business REIT ETF Exchange Traded Fund Item #1 Nature of interest Share Holder Item #1 Value of interest C : At least $10,000 but less than $25,000 Item #1 Number of Shares 206.0 START Item #2 Who holds interest? Filer Item #2 Legal name of business IShares Core S&P 500Item #2 Nature of business ETF Item #2 Nature of interest Share Holder Item #2 Value of interest G : At least $150,000 but less than $250,000 Item #2 Number of Shares 903.0 START Item #3 Who holds interest? Filer Item #3 Legal name of business IShares Russell 1000 Value Item #3 Nature of business ETF Item #3 Nature of interest Share Holder Item #3 Value of interest F : At least $100,000 but less than $150,000 Item #3 Number of Shares 1029.0


Dear Parent who Thinks Vaccine Legislation is About Vaccines…

You’re wrong, and I hate to tell you that.

Because I wish more than anything that I was wrong. That I was an alarmist or a conspiracy theorist. But, I am not.

I am a normal parent like you. I love my child more than is reasonable, and then I lock myself in the bathroom because 5 seconds of silence is better than a trip to Hawaii.

I know you’ve seen the vaccine legislation flying around. You’ve probably thought, “good, wrangle in all those anti-science, lost parents, and mandate they take care of their kids!” Where’s the debate? Science is settled. I should know, I’ve listened to my pediatrician since day 1 and refuse to read the data, funder, and to the whistleblowers behind those two autism studies. 100% of my vaccine knowledge I heard on Sesame Street and vaccine commercials – and who could be more honest?



Photo credit: Pixabay

I wish I could agree. I wish we could complain together over glasses of wine about how fussy our recently vaccinated children are. But I can’t.

Because I did the research. I have piles of books from doctors, immunologists, scientists and parents. I’ve poured over the raw data, sliced VAERS reports, and I have seen it. I have seen before my eyes children harmed.

But you see, that isn’t even it. Vaccines are a product, and as long as product is sold, you can buy. (The manufacturer hasn’t been liable for their destruction since 1986, but that’s none of my business). Buy away. Heck, get ’em on the black market and take 38 at a time. Not my business.

But, this isn’t about vaccines, autism, or “anti-vaxxers.” This is about your rights to make decisions for your children.

As bills pass into laws across the country, and those anti-vaxxers are put in their place, they are securing you in your place. Precedents are being established to ensure your child’s education, medical choices, and religion are the property of the State.

What happens when you are us?

When you need to make a medical choice for your ill child and the doctors let you know that it’s their decision, so shut it.

When your child gets a chronic illness and can’t be vaccinated for a time, and they are forced to leave school, too?

When your parenting is questioned because your child seizes after a round of antibiotic, but CPS is called if you don’t give the next dose?

My friend, it is not if, it’s when. 

So keep pretending that those of us posting updates, asking you to call your legislators, with the severely vaccine-injured or healthy vaccine-free children are just bored/crazy/on too much chlorella.

We will be ousted before we can say “we told you so,” and show you how to fight for your rights.

What if, those “anti-vaxxers” are looking out for you? What if you stop to think about them as a person. Are they kind? Are they honest? Or are they horrible people? (If you’re not sure, check the forums. You can find a vaccine-educated person speaking kindly, eloquently, using “big” words and citing their sources. You will know a pro-vaxxer when you see words like “idiot,” “killer,” “I don’t need to have a source, it’s common knowledge,” before they leave because they got nothin’).

I will let you in on the secret. We do this because we care about you and your kids. We want our children to grow up in freedom, just like yours, shots or no shots. 

So, for goodness sake, read the status.

Call the Senator. 

Click the link.

Ask them questions.

Do not be afraid to “like” or “comment.”

Stand up, parent. 



reprinted from


FACT: Infant Mortality Increases as the Number of Mandated Vaccines Increases


Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?

Neil Z Miller and Gary S Goldman


The infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important indicators of the socio-economic well-being and public health conditions of a country. The US childhood immunization schedule specifies 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year—the most in the world—yet 33 nations have lower IMRs. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. Nations were also grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges: 12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26. The mean IMRs of all nations within each group were then calculated. Linear regression analysis of unweighted mean IMRs showed a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates, with r = 0.992 (p = 0.0009). Using the Tukey-Kramer test, statistically significant differences in mean IMRs were found between nations giving 12–14 vaccine doses and those giving 21–23, and 24–26 doses. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs is essential.!po=26.0563


8-Year Old Utah Girl Dead From Flu After Being Vaccinated

Things You’ll NEVER Hear on the Evening News!


 Source: Matthew Paul


An 8-year old Utah girl named Mackenzie Coyne died after being diagnosed with the flu. Doctors believe another infection could have contributed, but feel the flu was the core issue and cause of death. She WAS flu vaccinated.

PARK CITY, Utah (ABC4 Utah) – 8 Year Old Mackenzie Coyne of Park City died Sunday shortly after testing positive for influenza A. Her family said it progressed quickly over the weekend, even though she had a flu shot. Now the community is coming together for her family to help.

She celebrated her birthday last Friday when she told her dad she was a little under the weather. On Saturday her family urged her to rest and she did get sick once. They assumed she was sick like most kids get. By Sunday they noticed something was wrong and took her to the urgent care where she tested positive for influenza A.

Family friend Carrie Prater said that an ambulance rushed her to the hospital 20 minutes later, but things deteriorated fast. Shortly after arriving she was gone even though doctors tried to revive her.

“Literally went from bad to worse to she was gone.” said Prater. “It’s very unreal at this point.

Now the question is, when was she flu vaccinated? We have two options here: Either the flu shot was terribly ineffective, or the flu shot gave this little girl the flu. She was in second grade. 8-years of age and they are jabbing her with a flu shot. I wish more parents could see the light. This story is likely to be buried before day’s end and I assume we won’t know the date of the flu shot she received. This year’s flu shot company line has stood by it being incredibly effective. In the case of little Mackenzie, something clearly went tragically wrong. I assume this will be chalked up as another “random” occurrence. Such a sad (and preventable) story.

Grief counselors plan to be on hand at the school on Monday to help her classmates deal with this tragedy.

Image credit:

Sign the Petition: Repeal Immunity for Drug Companies Against Vaccine Injuries!

Hold these evil multi-national poison peddlers accountable for the death and destruction they cause!


Source: Matthew Paul

Hold these evil multi-national poison peddlers accountable for the death and destruction they cause!

It is CRIMINAL that a vaccine injured human being cannot sue the drug company that made the vaccine. This immunity is not granted for ANY other product in our country. Doesn’t that alone lend itself to some suspicion?

My best friend was never given a dime for her vaccine injured child. Please help. The current rate of Autism is 1 in 49 boys. Cancer in children was almost unheard of before the vaccines of the 1960’s. I pray to God most children will not have an adverse effect from vaccines, but please have some compassion for those children whose immune systems cannot handle the CDC recommended 72 doses that our children are supposed to receive as of 2016.

Please take two seconds and sign this petition.

I Signed… Will You?

6 out of 7 Vaccination Bills Defeated, 1 More to Go!!!


6 out of 7 Vaccination Bills Defeated, 1 More to Go!!!

SB 2316 / HB 1910 The Mandatory HPV Vaccination Bill Tabled Indefinitely!!!

Not only was it tabled indefinitely but it was tabled with the statement that they will “draft a resolution” recommending INSTEAD, the Dept. of Education work with the Dept. of Health to “create educational materials for the parents of all students.” Roz Baker then added “An educational campaign would serve us well at this point.” So you the parents will decide!

HUGE victory IMO. This was Roz Bakers baby, and had OVERWHELMING support. 10 out of 25 Senators sponsored this bill.. the bill was a shoe in. Our insider told us to just “Give Up” on the Senate as it would be impossible to defeat SB 2316 in the Senate because it had soooo much political muscle behind it. We were advised to just defeat it in the house. That’s how BIG this victory was.

MAKE NO MISTAKE, It was the hard work of those that stood up and spoke out that changed the tide and made the difference! Good Work to all of you who answered the call. I strongly believe it was our testimonies, calls and emails that raised the level of awareness of the Senators (some of them) and well as alerted them to the amount of opposition and outrage toward this “mandate” that caused them to abort this bill in favor of an educational campaign.

Removal of Religious Exemption Billa and Surrender All Choice to the Federal Beaurocracy Bill Expired

These bills would have needed to be introduced last week in order for them to be passes in this session of the legislature, so they have been defeated by default.

I strongly believe that after we made headlines about how the public was up in arms over these freedom crushing mandates that they wanted no piece of these bills during an election year.  Keep a watchful eye for these bills to return next legislative session.

Last Bill Standing

The only Bill left that can still be passed is the Mandatory Flu Shot for all healthcare workers.  This can and hopefully will still be defeated.  More nurses need to stand up for their rights, where were all of you!?!?  I saw only 2 nurses down there fighting for their God Given Rights!  They had more paid pharma trolls from industry reading a script full of lies from their bosses than nurses who cared enough to show up tell the government to keep their laws off their bodies.  Myself and others did our best to combat the lies and junk science presented by industry, but guess what?  If enough people don’t show up to demand their rights then the legislature will vote for the industry that lines their pockets.  This isn’t over, if you care enough to stop this bill go to and take action!


The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance

Those of us on the front lines do not believe for a minute the powers that be will let this go.  They got a black eye, but they will be back to push their agenda they have intention of just letting this go.

Sign Up for Hearing Notices at

Never Miss a Hearing on the Bill You are Watching!
Watch my video below to learn how.

8 Questions to handle a Pro Vax Assault

8 Questions to handle a Pro Vax Assault

Conversation PramIt might be a neighbor, a relative, or a casual acquaintance. It might even be your pediatrician or other health care provider. They make some outrageous or attacking comment about how the non-vaccinated (they usually say Unvaccinated, but it’s not possible to “un” vaccinate a person, so I prefer the term “non” vaccinated) are putting everyone at risk, are harming their own kids and others, etc.

The interesting thing is most of these people have no idea about the science behind the vaccination debate nor the forces promoting the oft repeated mantras “vaccines are safe and effective; they’ve saved the world; you’re stupid if you don’t get one; if there are risks they are very very rare.”

What is a thinking person to do? If you care about this person, or if you are going to have to bump up against this person at some future points in life and really don’t want the whole litany to come out again, you might like this plan.

Learn a couple of key questions to ask your staunch vaccine proponent and tell them, “If you can answer a couple of questions, I’d be happy to discuss this topic further with you.”

Here is a sample of some of the questions that might be helpful, complete with the answers, or you may like to think up your own questions.

#1 What is MRC-5 and WI-38 and what vaccines are they in?

Aborted Fetal CellsAnswer – MRC-5 and WI-38 are the names of two fetal cell lines derived from aborted human fetal tissue(aka human diploid cells or HDC) and used in the production of the mumps, rubella, measles, MMR, smallpox, polio, hepatitis A, chicken pox and shingles vaccines. RA-273 is another fetal cell line.

#2 Name three ingredients in vaccines

SH Truth on AluminumAnswer – Aluminum, Polysorbate 80, and Glutaraldehyde. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin and the FDA only allows 25 mcg in an IV for an adult. Polysorbate 80 is a surfactant known to facilitate access through the blood brain barrier and has been linked to sterility and other issues. Glutaraldehyde is used as a cleaner for oil and gas pipelines and medical equipment, and is currently in the DTaP and TDaP.

#3 What are hexavalent and pentavalent vaccines and at what age are they recommended?

Answer – Hexavalent and Pentavalent vaccines deliver either five or six different vaccines in one injection. Popular variations include diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, HIB and polio.

#4 What is a commonly used hexavalent vaccine that includes the DTaP and what is the total aluminum content as well as the EPA safe limit of aluminum for an adult IV?

Answer – PEDIARIX is a hexavalent vaccine targeting diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B virus, and poliomyelitis and is currently recommended in three doses for babies at  2, 4, and 6-months.[1] It is commonly given without parental knowledge or sometimes parents are told “It’s easier now, because there is only one needle.” This vaccine contains 850 mpg of aluminum, which is 825 mpg over what the EPA mandates as safe in an IV for an adult, and does not take into account the aluminum contained in other vaccines given at the same time.

Related question: What are the contraindications for PEDIARIX? or, should anyone NOT receive this vaccine?

YES! A previous vaccine reaction is a reason NOT to give future shots. This is part of the contraindications as listed in both the PEDIARIX and INFANRIX vaccine package inserts:

“4.2 Encephalopathy (e.g., coma, decreased level of consciousness, prolonged seizures) within 7 days of administration of a previous dose of a pertussis-containing vaccine that is not attributable to another identifiable cause is a contraindication to administration of any pertussis-containing vaccine, including PEDIARIX.

4.3 Progressive Neurologic Disorder progressive encephalopathy is a contraindication to administration of any pertussis-containing vaccine, including PEDIARIX. Pertussis vaccine should not be administered to individuals with these conditions until a treatment regimen has been established and the condition has stabilized.”[2]

Recomended Vaccines 83-2015#5 How many vaccines are recommended for a baby by 18 months?

Answer – 42 vaccines are recommended by the CDC for all babies by the time they are 18 months old. Each containing toxic chemicals including Aluminum, formaldehyde, Glutaraldehyde, Polysorbate 80, Propylene Glycol, and foreign DNA fragments from human fetuses, monkeys, pigs, guinea pigs, dogs and insects.[3] Additional vaccines are recommended from 4-6 years old and more in adolescents.

Related question – How many vaccines are currently in production that they want to add to this list?

Answer – ±270 new vaccines at this time.

#6 Explain the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. When was it passed and what did it accomplish?

Answer – The US Congress passed the NCVIA in 1986 when the pharmaceutical companies came to them and threatened not to make any more vaccines unless they would be protected from any liability of lawsuits for damages or deaths resulting from vaccines. Doctors and pediatricians are also protected from liability. No drug company or doctor can be sued if a baby, child or adult dies or suffers from permanent damage from any vaccine.

#7 Who is Dr Paul Offit?

Answer – Dr Paul Offit is one of the most vocal proponents for the vaccine industry and is from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. He put together patents on the RotaTeq vaccine that earned him multi millions of dollars and has written several books targeting those who seek to expose the risks of vaccines.

SH Aluminum in shots#8 How many vaccines has Dr Offit said a child can receive at one time?

Answer – Dr Offit was quoted in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics,Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System? “A baby could respond safely and effectively to around 10,000 vaccines at any one time.”

SH Paul Offit on AluminumFurther, Dr Offit maintains that since aluminum is found in all tissues of the body it plays an important role in the development of a healthy fetus, despite the fact that researchers in the field of aluminum have determined that “aluminum has no healthful function in the body. It is a toxin and a toxin only.”

If you would like to learn more about aluminum in vaccines, this 30 minute video by Dr Suzanne Humphries is extremely well researched and provides vital clarity.

If you would like a printable version of these questions, a print version (pdf) is available here: 8 Questions to handle a Pro Vax Assault

Happy Grandparents June 13Compiler and editor: Becky Hastings, wife, mother, grandmother, passionate follower of Jesus Christ and truth seeker, especially in the areas of health and children. Facing a world quite different from the one in which I grew up, I seek to research and understand the true route to health, freedom and joyful family living!

[1] Vaccine Package Insert for PEDIARIX

[2] Vaccine Package Insert for INFANRIX

[2] CDC recommended immunization schedule for persons aged 0 through 18 years – United States, 2014. See further.


Reposted from:

Brazilian State Suspends Use of Chemical, Fearing Birth Defects


A report points to larvicide, not the Zika virus, as a possible cause of birth defects in Brazil.
Brazil’s state of Rio Grande do Sul has suspended the use of the mosquito-combating larvicide pyriproxyfen, the regional government said Sunday. The move follows a report by Argentine experts who claimed that it was the larvicide and not the Zika virus which is responsible for a wave of birth defects in Brazil, the Latin American News agency EFE reported.

Zika is widely thought to be linked with a wave of cases of microcephaly, a disease in which infants are born with abnormally small heads. The World Health Organization declared the Zika virus a world health emergency earlier this month.

A report conducted by the Argentine group Physicians in the Crop-Sprayed Towns (PCST), however, has pointed to pyriproxyfen, added to drinking water supplies to prevent the development of mosquito larvae, as the possible source of the birth defects.

RELATED: Brazil Declares War on Zika

Despite the fact that neither a link between larvicide and microcephaly, or Zika and microcephaly, has been conclusively proven, Rio Grande do Sul Health Secretary Joao Gabbardo said that the “suspicion” of a correlation led his team to “suspend” the use of the chemical.

“We cannot run that risk,” Gabbardo said.


Hospital staff Oswaldo Cruz prepares to draw blood from baby who has microcephaly, at the Oswaldo Cruz Hospital in Recife, Brazil, Jan. 26, 2016. | Reuters

“Previous Zika epidemics did not cause birth defects in newborns, despite infecting 75 percent of the population in those countries,” the Argentine report said. “Also, in other countries such as Colombia there are no records of microcephaly; however, there are plenty of Zika cases.”

In response to Rio Grande do Sul’s ban of the larvicide and the recent report, Brazil’s Health Minister Marcelo Castro reiterated that the larvicide presents no danger to the public, calling the claims “rumors.”

“That is a rumor lacking logic and sense. It has no basis. (The larvicide) is approved by (the National Sanitary Monitoring Agency) and is used worldwide. Pyriproxyfen is recognized by all regulatory agencies in the whole world,” the minister told reporters while in the northeastern city of Salvador.

RELATED: Argentina Social Movements Strike Back Against Monsanto

The report added that the pesticide, also known as SumiLarv, is manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical, which has collaborated with the controversial Monsanto Company in Brazil and Argentina on weed control.

“There is no scientific basis for such a claim,” Sumitomo Chemical said in a statement, according to EFE, emphasizing that its product has been approved by the World Health Organization since 2004 and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency since 2001.

While officials in Colombia have said that there are no recorded cases of Zika-infected pregnant women bearing children with microcephaly, Colombia has still followed the dozens of regional and international governments warning pregnant women to stay away from areas with mosquito infestations.

Brazil’s government has vowed to fight the spread of the Zika virus, with President Dilma Rousseff declaring a war on the mosquitoes responsible for spreading the Zika virus, and committing numerous resources to aid affected populations by finding a vaccine.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control strongly linked the birth defects in Brazil to the Zika virus in testimony before the U.S. Senate.

WATCH: World Health Organisation on Zika Virus

This content was originally published by teleSUR at the following address: “”.